Home > Connection Timed > Dig Trace Connection Timed Out No Servers Could Be Reached

Dig Trace Connection Timed Out No Servers Could Be Reached

Contents

nl. 172800 IN NS ns1.dns.nl. This is the preferred method if your DNS needs to be fixed/setup fast and you don't have the time to bounce messages back and forth on a forum. com. 172800 IN NS c.gtld-servers.net. But I'm only picking at straws since I'm not familiar with Kerberos nor all the ramifications involved with GSS-TSIG implementation. Source

So let's see what it managed to cache. Contact Us - Advertising Info - Rules - LQ Merchandise - Donations - Contributing Member - LQ Sitemap - Main Menu Linux Forum Android Forum Chrome OS Forum Search LQ Home Forum Today's Posts | FAQ | Calendar | Community Groups | Forum Actions Mark Forums Read | Quick Links View Site Leaders | Unanswered Posts | Forum Rules Articles Marketplace asked 9 months ago viewed 4697 times Related 2Wired Connection Problem on a Lenovo Workstation e202Not able to connect to local network1Internet connection not working although it says it is connected1Conflict

Connection Timed Out No Servers Could Be Reached Nslookup Linux

Find More Posts by dkm999 06-17-2008, 03:46 PM #12 kbighorse LQ Newbie Registered: Jun 2008 Posts: 20 Original Poster Rep: Some tcpdump output that might be helpful: ... 13:31:00.110143 Jun 13 18:10:00 xmail1 avahi-daemon[1979]: New relevant interface eth0.IPv4 for mDNS. thanks so much for your help!

so I think the IDS theory that Andrew sugests is true... This is the preferred method if your DNS needs to be fixed/setup fast and you don't have the time to bounce messages back and forth on a forum. kbighorse View Public Profile View LQ Blog View Review Entries View HCL Entries Find More Posts by kbighorse 06-16-2008, 10:58 PM #11 dkm999 Member Registered: Nov 2006 Location: Seattle, Connection Timed Out No Servers Could Be Reached Redhat I can ssh and ping to local machines from xmail1, and sendmail successfully sends slowly, but it's really gummed up because of the DNS issue here.

Lithium Battery Protection Circuit - Why are there two MOSFETs in series, reversed? Connection Timed Out No Servers Could Be Reached Ubuntu com. 172800 IN NS e.gtld-servers.net. com. 172800 IN NS g.gtld-servers.net. akadns.net. 124662 IN NS usw6.akadns.net. ;; ADDITIONAL SECTION: asia3.akadns.net. 3270 IN A 61.200.81.111 asia5.akadns.net. 1925 IN A 63.150.131.80 asia9.akadns.net. 11805 IN A 220.73.220.4 eur4.akadns.net. 3270 IN A 195.219.3.169 usc4.akadns.net. 12038 IN

com. 172800 IN NS m.gtld-servers.net. Centos Nslookup Connection Timed Out Trying Next Origin com. 172800 IN NS i.gtld-servers.net. ;; Received 489 bytes from 202.12.27.33#53(202.12.27.33) in 6128 ms dhl.com. 172800 IN NS ns4.dhl.com. Currently I have a CentOS virtual machine as well as a Lubuntu virtual machine both running in VMware workstation (this is my test environment before I implement them on actual hardware).I First post for me.I'm a networking student working on my final project for my course.

Connection Timed Out No Servers Could Be Reached Ubuntu

Jun 13 18:03:14 xmail1 avahi-daemon[1979]: Interface eth0.IPv4 no longer relevant for mDNS. com. 172800 IN NS M.GTLD-SERVERS.NET. ;; Received 495 bytes from 202.12.27.33#53(M.ROOT-SERVERS.NET) in 101 ms microsoft.com. 172800 IN NS ns1.msft.net. Connection Timed Out No Servers Could Be Reached Nslookup Linux a.gtld-servers.net. 172800 IN A 192.5.6.30 b.gtld-servers.net. 172800 IN A 192.33.14.30 c.gtld-servers.net. 172800 IN A 192.26.92.30 d.gtld-servers.net. 172800 IN A 192.31.80.30 e.gtld-servers.net. 172800 IN A 192.12.94.30 f.gtld-servers.net. 172800 IN A 192.35.51.30 g.gtld-servers.net. Nslookup Connection Timed Out Trying Next Origin Join Date Jun 2008 Posts 3 dig output [[email protected] ~]# ping 64.81.79.2 PING 64.81.79.2 (64.81.79.2) 56(84) bytes of data. 64 bytes from 64.81.79.2: icmp_seq=0 ttl=58 time=2.89 ms 64 bytes from 64.81.79.2:

If not, there may be a blanket prohibition on its address, and/or the firewall (router) may not be doing NAT for it. http://jscience.net/connection-timed/dns-problem-connection-timed-out-no-servers-could-be-reached.html firewall status/config on host and guest –EdiD Mar 9 at 12:08 So, I just restarted my Ubuntu and its working now. Find More Posts by dkm999 06-17-2008, 06:54 PM #14 kbighorse LQ Newbie Registered: Jun 2008 Posts: 20 Original Poster Rep: Thanks, I ran 'nslookup 64.79.81.2' and 'ping www.google.com' with kbighorse View Public Profile View LQ Blog View Review Entries View HCL Entries Find More Posts by kbighorse 06-17-2008, 05:15 PM #13 dkm999 Member Registered: Nov 2006 Location: Seattle, Connection Timed Out; No Servers Could Be Reached Bind

Also, check out these links: Whois Direct | DNS Crawler | NS Trace | Compare Free DNS Hosts Faq Reply With Quote August 25th, 2005,01:16 PM #7 No Profile Picture What's the purpose of the same page tool? b.akamaiedge.net. 2874 IN NS n4b.akamaiedge.net. have a peek here but Andrew, how about the other domain with problems?, in some cases I am not getting the nameserver's IP address as in the dhl example, also we could deduct that the

So click on the link "g.www.ms.akadns.net" to resolve it. Nslookup No Servers Could Be Reached Ubuntu Now, I don't know what happened in your case, but I'm sitting here staring at the fact "asia3.akadns.net (61.200.81.111)" timed out, then "Querying asia5.akadns.net (63.150.131.80)" timed out, and finally "asia9.akadns.net (220.73.220.4)" com. 172800 IN NS I.GTLD-SERVERS.NET.

Reply With Quote 06-17-2008 #6 Lazydog View Profile View Forum Posts Private Message View Articles Linux Guru Join Date Jun 2004 Location The Keystone State Posts 2,798 Originally Posted by kbighorse

Top brandonbelanger Posts: 3 Joined: 2012/01/24 23:40:32 Re: Client not recieving DNS information through DHCP Quote Postby brandonbelanger » 2012/01/25 18:23:11 Morning everyone. I am betting that your xmail1 machine somehow thinks that it ought to be asking for that nameserver, rather than the ones you reported in your resolv.conf. www.google.com. (32) 18:47:12.028237 IP (tos 0x0, ttl 64, id 25886, offset 0, flags [DF], proto UDP (17), length 60) 192.168.1.21.32877 > 216.231.41.2.53: 22006+ A? Dig Couldn T Get Address For No More com. 172800 IN NS F.GTLD-SERVERS.NET.

com. 172800 IN NS E.GTLD-SERVERS.NET. Standards say that every alias should be CNAME'd to the canonical domain - not to yet another alias. presuming, of course, that the firewall is actually a un*x box. Check This Out If you like you could post your rules for us to look and see where the problem might be.

com. 172800 IN NS L.GTLD-SERVERS.NET. I actually have 2 boxes with this problem, and at least 7 other boxes in the same subnet are working fine, so I'm fairly confident it's a problem with the individual

© 2017 jscience.net